From ea23f9858ab4a6b5cd4a255d2ac5975d43b99a38 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 10:13:34 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] spelling: wasteful Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> --- .../src/main/java/javazoom/jl/decoder/BitReserve.java | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/libsrc/jlayer-1.0.2/src/main/java/javazoom/jl/decoder/BitReserve.java b/libsrc/jlayer-1.0.2/src/main/java/javazoom/jl/decoder/BitReserve.java index 2716658bb..0718f7af9 100644 --- a/libsrc/jlayer-1.0.2/src/main/java/javazoom/jl/decoder/BitReserve.java +++ b/libsrc/jlayer-1.0.2/src/main/java/javazoom/jl/decoder/BitReserve.java @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ package javazoom.jl.decoder; * The implementation stores single bits as a word in the buffer. If * a bit is set, the corresponding word in the buffer will be non-zero. * If a bit is clear, the corresponding word is zero. Although this - * may seem waseful, this can be a factor of two quicker than + * may seem wasteful, this can be a factor of two quicker than * packing 8 bits to a byte and extracting. *

* REVIEW: there is no range checking, so buffer underflow or overflow